About drilling holes with a hammer

reading time: 2 minutes

We see this happening at our companies all the time. We pour money into acquisition when we have retention problems. We place all our bets on recovering users that are unhappy beyond repair when we should be improving our UX and customer support.

Deep down we know that the right thing would be to figure out the root causes of the problem first. Still, who would have the courage and expertise to debate with the CEO that our acquisition problem is actually an engagement problem?

And it’s more complicated than that because it doesn’t seem like too much of a problem at first. People know that if they hammer a wall hard enough a hole will be open anyway. So why not just do that?

So we open a big, messy, ugly, not-so-useful hole.

Still, the target was achieved. Everyone got their bonus. Shareholders were happy. Everything looks great – except we’ve all hooked on bad behavior now.

Then next year arrives and a new, ambitious target is set.

“Because we were so successful last year, we believe we can deliver twice as many holes this year.”

So the work starts. People start to see cracks here and there, then everywhere. They start wondering how long can they continue before our wall gets so damaged to the point where it becomes useless.

Doesn’t matter, it’s past half-year already. We don’t have the data or research budget to find a better pathway now. We can’t afford to stop. It’s literally hammer time now.

An infinite loop of stale growth has started. At some point, negative compounding effects will start to kick in.

But it can still be saved. If could only we admit we’re wrong. If only we could create the headspace to learn about the marvels of drilling machines, this could all be different.


Everybody’s new favorite SEO job board 🇧🇷

The dream came true for companies looking to hire SEO talent – as well as SEO people that are looking for exciting job opportunities. The platform launched by Mariana Pessoa and Yuri Moreno was recently launched and already contains over 30 listings from companies like Globo, Nestlé, i-Cherry, Mirium, and many others. Check it out.


📕 What I’ve been reading

This Won’t Scale: this book was recommended by a friend (Rafael Coda) and I’m really glad he did. It’s not a technical book by any means. It doesn’t provide a linear step-by-step guide. But, it can open your eyes to unconventional ways to market a product. I believe this book can be especially useful for people working on B2B SaaS, Product Marketers, or people who are working on companies who didn’t launch their product yet. It’s also a quick read, I was able to re-read a couple of parts of it on the same night I read the whole thing.

Como criar uma máquina de testar ofertas: beyond being fun people to be around, Jorge and João are also great marketers. In this 8,000-word-long essay, they describe how to create a machine to test your offers from awareness to conversion and retention. It’s so dense and filled with details that it could easily be a 2-day bootcamp. If you’re struggling with building your own conversion machine, then this is the article for you.

🤔 What does a Marketing Consultant actually do?

It’s not uncommon to hear this question from potential clients and aspiring consultants.

Even my parents, family, and close friends ask it sometimes, too – with an evident embarrassment on their faces (although they shouldn’t have to feel embarrassed at all). Maybe this article will help them understand what I’m getting paid for then. Or if you’re already working in the internet industry, then this article should provide you with a more detailed overview of how’s the work-life like for a Marketing Consultant.

I’ll break down my explanation into three parts:

  1. Scope and Jobs to be done
  2. What does success look like
  3. Daily routines

Continue…

Good Marketer, Bad Marketer

Good marketers have their eyes on the prize. They’re not distracted by vanity metrics because the expected outcome is crystal-clear from day one.

They wear their customer’s shoes at all times. They can teleport themselves to each step of their customer journey and think: “How would I be feeling at this step? What would help me take the next step here?” – and then go and address just that. Good marketers also know the customer journey by heart and which medium to use when. They’d never use a hammer to drill a hole if it depended solely on them.

Bad marketers have fun at lunch talking about how much of an idiot their boss is for going all-in on an awareness campaign when the desired outcome is short-term revenue. Good marketers know when to educate others, even if they’re above their pay grade.

Good marketers influence many things: the product roadmap; how the budget will be distributed; the size of the sales team, the positioning; the strategy; and the tactics – even if they’re not in a leadership role. Bad marketers complain about last-minute top-down requests from upper management rather than taking it on themselves to improve their interpersonal skills. Bar marketers don’t realize that if they can’t sell their ideas to peers and leaders, they’ll probably not be able to sell them to customers too. Marketing is all about storytelling and selling ideas, after all, no matter who the target audience is.

Good marketers are great salespeople, even if they’re not aware of it. They naturally use their Marketing skills to promote their hard work and attract larger budgets for their projects. Bad marketers will complain that they never have the resources – money, people, or both – to achieve their goals.

Bad marketers never have the time to analyze their campaigns. There are always too many tasks or important meetings to attend. It’s a lousy lie they tell themselves to avoid the confrontation of looking at the results – or hiding the fact that they don’t have the hard skills yet. Instead of asking for help, they keep Schrödinger’s box closed.

Good marketers build cases to defend their ideas and get the needed support to make it work. And if they don’t have the data to do that, that’s no problem: they’ll be just as comfortable using assumptions and proxies to build a case. Also, these cases are always tied to the bottom line – aka revenue – not only top-of-the-funnel metrics.

Good marketers communicate clearly, ensuring everyone’s on the same page as a project evolves. The same logic applies to managing expectations. Bad marketers wait until the last minute to land the news on this display campaign that could’ve been paused ten days ago. Good marketers look at their stats and take action when something smells fishy.

Good marketers are tech-savvy. They know there’s a tool for everything these days. Even if they don’t know one by heart, one will be swiftly found with a few searches and clicks. They’re not intimidated by platforms they’ve never used before. It’s all software: inputs are provided, buttons are pressed, and magical things happen.  They can move whole markets with a few no-code tools, good copywriting, and a customer-centric mindset.

Good marketers understand that strategies, plans, and tactics aren’t written in stone. There’s no hesitation when a u-turn is needed to get back on track. It just takes a little courage and a good PowerPoint slide with the right amount of data and feedback from real customers.

Most of all, good marketers know they’re not the best they could be yet. They take each campaign and every project as a learning experience. Each lesson is a brick that is laid down firmly. Their knowledge palace only gets bigger, stronger, and more beautiful over time; It never parishes.

Still, bad marketers are considered good when they know one thing: it’s not about how good they are but about how good they want to be. It just takes time and the right mindset.

 


 

📕 What I’ve been reading and listening to

Who: A method for hiring A Players: I’ve been hiring people for a decade. Still, I must confess it’s one of those areas where sometimes it feels more like witchcraft than actual science – at least, so far. Although some things he explains are basic (like collecting references and then actually calling them), it provides an excellent blueprint, and essential tips can be built upon. Also, I read it in just 2 hours which was what I needed. This time I went one step forward and created a Notion template from this book. It contains a summary and a template so I can use it whenever I need to hire. Yes, I’ll be sharing it soon 🙂

How to deal with burnout: Josh Terry talks brilliantly explains in five minutes what the shift in perspective you need to make to prevent burnout. A must-watch in a post-pandemic world.

First Million Podcast with Ryan Holiday: I finally surrendered myself to it, and I regret nothing (thanks, Yuri, for the recommendation). In this episode, he breaks down the economics of book publishing which is an exciting topic. As an aspiring writer, this interview is all I asked for, so I thought it might be interesting for you too.

 

Was it worth starting a newsletter?

It’s been 90 days since I started this newsletter.

There were nine issues sent so far, and I think it’s great timing to talk about:

  • How many subscribers did I get so far?
  • What is my project self-assessment?
  • Why this newsletter will be English-first from now on.

This means that the depth and quality of the content I build in English should improve a lot. Great news for you, I guess 🙂

ps: for those who just arrived: go to my website to read previous editions so you can get up to speed.

 

📕 What am I reading

Rest: Why You Get More Done When You Work Less: this was my bedside book while on vacation. The central idea is that instead of thinking of work and rest as opposites, we should use the two together to have not only more productive careers but healthier lives as well.

What I thought was really cool about this book is that it balances well the scientific studies that show the impact of rest on the mind and body, but it also brings examples from people like Charles Darwin, Winston Churchill, and others to show how even people who are known for their high productivity had very well established rest routines.

Share of Searches: Les Binet proposes a new method for measuring brand awareness using organic search volume as a reference. The coolest thing is to see that this can be used as a leading indicator of market share. It is very much worth watching.

ASO Updates for the iOS 16: Apple will introduce benchmark data for metrics like Retention Rate and Conversion Rate; in addition to having announced that its search algorithm will take into account the behavior of its users. It will be interesting to keep an eye out and see this being applied in practice

Solving the cold start problem on a service business

Back in 2013, I founded Eyso with a couple of friends. We were the first Brazilian App Store Optimization company – one of the first ten in the world.

In that year:

– The iPhone 5 was the newest iPhone out there;

– Android achieved 75% of the market share – it was 50% the year before;

– My wife and I had our first baby (this young lady who now demands to appear on daddy’s posts once in a while)

If you have never heard about ASO, you can think of it as the SEO for Apps: instead of trying to rank a website on Google’s search results, we’d optimize our apps for the App Store and Google Play.

Our plan at Eyso was simple: sell ASO services and then use the revenue to build our tool. Pretty straightforward, right? We got lots of traction in the service side of the business but failed to create the tool we wanted. We closed our operations by the end of 2015.

Despite that, we did solve a big problem many of you probably faced – or will face at some point in your career: how to create demand for something that no one has ever heard about.

Remember, it was 20213.

Back then, most people thought we were making it up when we pitched them that there was such a thing. Our conversations with potential clients would often go like this:

Me: “These apps managed to 10x their downloads just by tweaking their keywords, title, ad optimizing their screenshots. We helped them do that. Maybe we could do the same for your app too.”

Potential client: “Yeah… Right. Sorry, I have to go. I need to go home and feed my llamas.”

>> By the way, did you know I have an App Store Optmization course available on demand? Click here to know more. <<

And there were other complications:

  1. SEO was going through a bad phase where people saw it as a bunch of black-hat and shady tactics (I can’t remember why, though);
  2. I was no expert on ASO, although I was confident in my SEO skills. I have only optimized one app, and I also knew this one guy – Saulo Arruda – who scored a 40X growth with his fart-sounds app;
  3. My partners and I had no track record of building such a business.

Why would anyone trust us, then?

Well, we simply never thought of it in that way.

Our train of thought was: we’ve seen how powerful this thing is. We’re confident it will be huge in a few years. The fact most people didn’t know ASO was an advantage rather than a weakness – or at least that’s how we thought about it.

That’s the most important thing: we were just confident in our ability to learn this thing and take it to the market. That was it.

Although we failed to build a SaaS, we successfully created a services/consulting business. And that’s the part of the story I’m bringing you today.

Eyso is the main reason why OLX decided to “import” me from Brazil to Portugal; It’s why I work for Afya nowadays (PEBmed, one of their companies, was one of our first ten clients); It’s how I met my best friends and Business partners; It’s how I collected know-how to launch my first self-published course; It’s how I knew there was an opportunity to build Easy App Reports.

Building Eyso was by far the most challenging thing I’ve ever done during my career. I would feel worried, stressed, and confused most of the time. But somehow, it was also one of the most rewarding work experiences ever.

Eyso Founders Rômulo Gomes, Ludmilla Veloso and Guilherme Brito

“One day, in retrospect, the years of struggle will strike you as the most beautiful.” – Sigmund Freud.

Fast Forward

A couple of years later, we had over 30 clients, driving millions of organic downloads to them. Word of mouth was finally picking up. Our pipeline was always constantly receiving new leads.

These are the high-level steps we followed to go from Zero to Hero:

  1. Reduced our pricing to get our first three to five clients
  2. Rebranding our offer and making our cases more modest
  3. Getting our first big client
  4. Build a success story for every project we ever worked
  5. Building and acquisition machine 
  6. 10x our price using value-based pricing

 

**IMPORTANT NOTE**

This article benefits from hindsight. Although all those initiatives were indeed planned, it’s easy to look back at it now and say it was all meant to be. Please take what you read here with a pinch of salt.

 

#1: Reduced our pricing to get our first three to five clients

Instead of charging R$ 2.500/month, which we believed to be the fair price for our services, we reduced it to R$ 950 for our first clients.

eyso sticker on a carOur primary acquisition channels were Facebook and LinkedIn groups on App Marketing, Meetups, and word of mouth from friends who believed in us.

After talking to people at these meetups, we found out that many app founders were launching their apps without even knowing what they could do to increase their chances of success by applying a few best practices. So we created a “launch package”: the first set of title, keywords, and description, as well as guidance on their screenshots – all for R$ 950.

It worked: we managed to close the app to whom we pitched this package. The app was called Fashion85. We could not believe how easy it was to close that deal.

This deal made us realize that this was maybe a viable business.

After that one, we closed a few more in the same format: pitching customers directly at events and offering our launch package.

During the couple of years to come, we’d still use it as a strategy to get new customers. Once the launch was done, we’d upsell them into a recurring service for 3-12 months.

 

#2 Rebranding our offer and making our cases more modest

At first, we’d pitch our service as “SEO for Apps.”

It was the most obvious thing we could do: give a familiar name to something that sounded too off for most people.

We couldn’t be more wrong.

This test failed miserably as we faced a more serious problem: SEO was going through a bit of crisis. Many founders believed it was just a bunch of short-term hacks that wouldn’t last for long. Together with the fact that the results we used to highlight from previous customers seemed too good to be true, we quickly realized we had to change our strategy.

Overseas, we noticed that other players were using the term App Store Optimization, which we also adopted and took to market.

Although customers didn’t know the term, they were much more receptive to it as it was seen as a newest-secret-most-people-yet-don’t-know-about. That gave it the sense of novelty and excitement we were looking for. The big companies wouldn’t buy it – at first – but the early adopters were more than eager to hear about it.

We’d still use the SEO analogy often to explain what it was, but we’d reinforce it was a different game.

Also, we made an effort to make our first success stories sound slightly less spectacular, so it was more credible. This was funny, by the way: people would prefer to hear we could grow their downloads by 20% – but not by 5x. It simply sounded much more credible.

That combination of rebranding our service and making our portfolio more modest helped us get to our first 5-10 clients.

In parallel, we were also dealing with another problem:

 

#3: Getting our first big client

Although we managed to sell a handful of launch packages, we were still far from closing more prominent clients for who we could charge more and stay with us for the long run.

Also, we realized we were being rejected because we lacked a big name in our portfolio (“if others don’t trust you, then I can’t trust you either”). Not having a famous name was becoming more of a problem as we tried to reach a larger audience – and having more small clients was seen as a signal that our service was not different from black hat strategies.

Oh, boy!

Our solution was to hustle our way into a big client to solve that problem once and for all.

Movile was our target. It was by far one of the biggest Brazilian app companies out there (still is, actually), and we had a couple of friends working there. That was all we needed.

We pitched them and negotiated for a few weeks. It was the second toughest deal we negotiated during those 2,5 years. Our track record wasn’t that impressive yet. Still, we managed to close the deal.

But that’s not the end of the story. Now the pressure was on.

We knew we were able to deliver tremendous results for small players, but we were not sure we could deliver anything for such a big player (their app, PlayKids, was already in the top 3 of its category). This was our own test of competence to understand if we were really ready or not for what was to come.

After all, we did manage to increase their downloads by 25%. YES!

That was more than enough to build the success story we needed. We were over the roof with those results, but the client, not so much.

Because I was so desperate to close, I agreed to help them optimize a few landing pages for their paid ads, which turned out to be a big mistake. I didn’t have the headspace to work on it and then ended up getting fired by the client for not fulfilling our promise entirely. Ouch.

A bittersweet victory, after all.

Still, having that business case was now our trophy: we’d highlight it on our home page, in lectures, and sales presentations. The best part: it was working just like we thought we would. 

>> Do you want to master ASO? Click here. <<

 

#4: Build a success story for every project we ever worked

meu game tem mais dowloads que o seu mug

Our favorite mug

Since then, creating a business case for every client, we had become a top priority. This was by far the easiest part but maybe the most crucial for our success.

 

Little by little, we started building cases for every app category out there: transportation, lifestyle, productivity, health, games, and so on.

 

That’s when things started to get more manageable on the sales side.

 

#5: Building our acquisition machine

We had three primary sources of leads:

  • The free ASO diagnostic tool on our website
  • Events and PR
  • Word of mouth

In the first six months of operations, our leads would come basically from lectures and meet-ups we’d host or attend.

eyso presentation at Intel
Talking about ASO @ Intel for Developers.

Even after that initial traction, this continued to be our primary growth lever. We just updated our game: after a while, we got invitations to volunteer at incubators and Startup Weekend (a weekend-long hackathon by Google). Those events would be filled with tech people, which would see us as an authority in the app industry and spread the word to their own companies.

romulo gomes web summit
A super happy me at the Web Summit in Dublin (2014). 

Eventually, we got a few mentions in the press, which sped up the flywheel, driving even more recommendations. At some point, this became a (good) problem, with too many proposals to be sent, forcing us to productize our offer and standardize the price.

romulo gomes aso entrevista pegn pequenas empresas midia
Interview for PEGN (Pequenas Empresas, Grandes Negócios) on ASO.

In parallel, our product-led strategy was based on a simple diagnostic tool we built. Anyone could go to our website, look up their apps, throw their keywords and get a free diagnostic (after providing their email address, of course).

eyso audit
Eyso free diagnostic example.

We didn’t have enough SEO traffic, so it took us a long time to get traction on it – like a year – but once it did, it became a reliable source of leads.

eyso website
The only image I found where you can see our website.

From that point on, we’d just try to maximize how much we could charge based on the size of the company, which takes me to the last point:

 

6: 10x our price using value-based pricing

We now faced a different problem: we couldn’t attend to more clients because we weren’t ready to scale.

This is also where things started to get a bit sour, to be honest.

Our purpose was never to build this massive service business. We wanted to be a massive SaaS – that’s what we wanted.

Still, we were getting more and more leads for our ASO services, but practically none on our tool.

Because of that, we never took the whole training people thing seriously. Instead, we simply thought about how to make the business more profitable so we could have more money to invest in product development.

That was also the point where we realized that some customers were getting an insane amount of value from our services. Firstly because ASO scales up nicely, but also because we were advising clients on other areas such as paid media, CRO, and retention strategies – making our service much more sophisticated than it was supposed to be.

Our new pricing strategy was: based on the success of previous customers, we’d project how much we could grow our client’s apps. 

Each install would have a value attached to it that we’d translate into revenue (if the app weren’t monetized, we’d calculate how much we could potentially save on paid acquisition for the client).

We knew we would deliver at least 30% growth in 3 months, based on the performance of past clients. By now, we could also quickly identify apps with great product-market-fit, making our lives much easier.

The formula was something like this:

Avg downloads (90 days) x ASO Target = Expected Downloads

Then we’d just have to figure out how much was an app install worth to that client to have a rough idea of the value we’d deliver. Then we’d price ourselves based on that (usually around 10-15%).

So what started around R$500 quickly became R$ 5.000, all the way to R$ 15.000/month for one client in particular.

That was the last tactic we used to grow our business.

 

What didn’t work

There was also a few things that didn’t work. I’ll not go deep into it, but it’s still worth mentioning it:

  • Running paid ads
  • Partnerships with agencies
  • Partnerships with other tools
  • Hiring interns to delegate work
  • Expand internationally

 

If it was going so well, why did it still fail then?

The service side of the business never failed. We just gave up on it.

As I mentioned before, we wanted to build a platform: a badass worldwide SaaS business. Instead, we created an interesting services business, which wasn’t what we wanted.

So, after 30 months, we shut down our operations. But that’s a story for another day.

 


📕 What I’ve been reading

Churn Rate Myths (Reforge): I absolutely love this article. If you’re trying to reduce churn at your company, you must understand these three common myths.

Achieve your goals with less grinding: great article on how your perception can influence our sense of difficulty towards our goals. I’ve been struggling with this lately, so it was the perfect timing for me to read this article.

Joyland by Stephen King: I’m officially on a non-fiction detox this summer and I can’t recommend it enough if you’re into thrillers. The writing from Stephen is so smooth, the guy is an absolute legend.

Retention is the new Acquisition

Retention is the new Acquisition

There’s a misconception in our market where Acquisition is mistaken for Growth.

That couldn’t be further from the truth.

I understand that there are at least three different types Growth:

– User Growth

– Revenue Growth

– Usage Growth

If we’re talking about Revenue Growth, you could massively increase it just by doubling down on monetization. I believe this angle by itself makes it clear why Acquisition (meaning user acquisition) doesn’t necessarily lead to Growth.

Still, I don’t think this holds true only from a revenue perspective. It seems that when we talk about Growth, we’re talking about Acquisition instead. And whereas it isn’t completely off to think like that, I do believe that it’s a narrow view that can severely limit our approach to Growth.

We can even see it reflected in the roles we have now. SEM positions disguised as Growth Marketing roles. Or Lifecycle, Content Marketing, SEO, or Performance Marketing. It’s all Growth Marketing now. So it must mean that it’s all Growth, right?

Not really.

We could agree that Growth Marketing is about all Acquisition-driven stuff done at scale. But now Growth as a whole.

In order to grow, a product or service needs to be able to accumulate customers – with a big emphasis on the accumulation part.

If not, they’ll grow and fall as fast as the Clubhouse hype – or Google+, Periscope, and so many others who snowballed only to fail as fast as they acquired new users. They failed due to not delivering enough value, which is one of the leading causes of poor retention.

ps: remember, last week we discussed why engagement leads to retention – not the other way around.

Retention dictates how fast your acquisition can be translated into Growth. Not any kind of Growth, but the one we like to see: consistent, steady, and ready to compound.

But sometimes I guess we forget that.

Growth comparison between companies with the same acquisition but different retention rates
How retention drives acquisition

 

Even in a bullish scenario where a company manages to acquire new customers every month, it’ll run out of people to sell its products. At some point, they’ll need as many repeat customers as possible to continue growing. And they’ll need those customers to spread the word to keep their customer acquisition cost (CAC) under control.

And it goes beyond the leaky bucket problem. This is actually about customer centricity and delivering value. That’s because:

Retention signals product-market-fit – especially for paid products.

Product-market-fit signals customer happiness.

Customer happiness signals positive word of mouth.

Positive Word of Mouth drives referrals.

Which drives Compounding Growth.

I’d even say that Acquisition is nearly useless if you can’t deliver what has been promised to your customers.

Growth is so much about Retention as it is about Acquisition. Heck, I’d even argue that it’s actually more important.

Because retention is what you want, it’s the thing you can’t fake. There’s just no way around it: your product either stands up to its promise to customers or doesn’t.

Like I posted yesterday: Acquisition can be bought; Retention must be earned.

How retention drives acquisition

 

“What about e-commerce?” you ask. “They can rely 100% on Acquisition and still be fine”

I believe the same logic holds for them. They still rely on repeat sales to grow and positive word of mouth to attract new customers. Otherwise, they’d be forced to acquire new users indefinitely. This would be a problem because they rely primarily on paid acquisition, which ramps up over time. Even in the rare case that you manage to outsmart your customers and push junk to them, they’d eventually accumulate too many detractors. This generates massive negative word of mouth to the point where acquiring new users becomes virtually impossible. That’s why lots of scammy products never really take off: although they’re able to drive decent sales, at some point, it all stops: angry customers will start complaining and denouncing it all over the internet. This also explains why such products or services usually rely on distribution channels where customer feedback is poor or inexistent (think about scammy products advertised for older adults on TV shows, for example).

Closing

There’s a lot of confusion about Growth and Growth Marketing, Retention and Engagement, Product Growth and Growth, etc. People may say that there are different interpretations of it, but I disagree. I see that these multiple interpretations sometimes even hold us back from doing our best work.

I believe the best collaboration happens when our communication can be clear and assertive. That can only occur when we have the same understanding of what we mean when we say things. So I’ll continue discussing these definitions with people until we achieve common ground.

I’m also aware this topic bothers me more than usual because of my idiosyncrasy, but I don’t mind.

If you don’t agree with something I wrote here, do write me back: I’d love to explore other possibilities with you and write a new version of this article.

Oh, and I remember last week I promised an article on Activation, but as I was writing it, I realized that it was more important to go through this thought exercise first. We’ll get there, don’t worry.

 

📕What I’ve been reading

How to design a referral program by Andrew Chen: great timing from Andrew to release this article in the same period we start to dig into Growth 😉

New App Store ads: Apple continues to ramp up its ad game by adding a new ad unit to the App Store.

Engagement vs Retention | NR #5

Retention is breadth. Engagement is depth.
– Brian Balfour

Retention is how long the user stays in your product.
Engagement is how frequently and intensively your customers use your product.

If Retention can be measured in lifetime, Engagement would be the measure of the quality of that lifetime.

Let’s put it in an example:

Louis and Paul have been using Miro for a year in their company. They have the same retention.

Louis is a Marketing Manager. She uses Miro to facilitate brainstorm sessions, run online workshops, or simply put [her thoughts on paper]. She’s Miro’s cheerleader inside the company, being the main reason why they started paying for it in the first place.

Louis uses Miro every day.

Paul loves Miro too. It’s the first time he interacts with it. He’s a Lifecycle intern so he uses Miro when his manager, Louis, invites him to brainstorm sessions and team-building activities. Paul doesn’t yet dominate Miro’s functionality and never created a board for himself.

Paul uses Miro once every two weeks or so.

Louis is significantly more engaged than Paul.

I guess we wouldn’t have to go dive deep into our data to bet that Louis is much more likely to continue using Miro for a very long time – even if she moves to another company.

Paul does enjoy using Miro too, but he never invited a colleague there or played around with his own boards. The chance of Paul continuing to use Miro if he moves to another company probably isn’t that high.

Now that we cleared out the difference between engagement and retention, let’s look at how we should think about it in practical terms.

The problem with “optimizing for retention.”

When we’re at work, we often hear about “improving our retention.”

Watch out for this one, as it’s a conceptual red flag.

It means that your company probably doesn’t understand that retention is the result of activation and engagement – and not the other way around.

> Retention = Activation + Engagement

Retention is what we call an output metric. It is the result of activation (we’ll discuss it next week) and engagement. So, to increase your overall retention rate, the only way to do it is by actually improve your input metrics (engagement and activation).

And it’s easy to see that if we reflect on real customer stories. Let’s continue on our example from Louis and Paul.

If we want to increase our chances of staying with Paul for the long run, what would we have to do? I don’t work at Miro, but I can guess what I’d like to see Paul doing more so it becomes more engaged. Things like:

– Creating his first board
– Spending X minutes playing around with his board (activation)
– Sharing his board with at least one person
– Creating a second board after X days (habit formation)

But how?

Not by sending a blunt 7-day email series on how to create a board. Right?

Instead, we can do our best to understand Paul’s jobs to be done and think backward to hypothesize how could we help him by using Miro.

Then, we could look at our Marketing Channels and Product Real Estate – banners, in-app messaging, tours, etc – to figure out what would be the best way to take that message to him. A message that would aim to connect Paul to experiment more with Miro’s core product value.

The whole idea here is that, If we do our job well, we’ll actually manage to help our customers. This will deepen their engagement, which will then be reflected not only in retention rates but also on the positive network effects it may unlock.

As far as I can tell, that’s the proper way to look at it.

What usually happens when we optimize for retention instead
This is not only not optimal but also potentially harmful to your branding and product positioning. I’ll explain.

From experience, I can see that this train of thought usually leads to artificial tactics such as:

– Forced onboarding experiences
– Unsolicited trial extensions
– Dull drip campaigns
– Random discounts
– etc

Those are all classic desperate moves – usually taken when teams don’t understand the forces at play when we talk about retention and engagement.

I call it desperate because although they might make the numbers look better in the short term, they fail to address to solve the root causes of engagement problems. It can also deplete your brand’s value and contribute negatively to word of mouth – which is easy to cover up.

If I look back at all failed retention strategies I’ve seen in the past years, they all have a flavor of these artificial strategies.


Summary
– Retention is about how long the user stays in your product. Engagement is all about usage frequency and intensity
– Retention is an output of your Activation and Engagement
– Proper engagement strategies are rooted in customer centricity and great analytics
– Poor retention strategies use artificial leverages to force the user through the product journey

 

 


🧠 Podcasts I’ve been listening

This podcast episode with Elena Verna on how B2B Growth is Changing is incredible. I started to follow her on LinkedIn a few weeks back and the only regret I have is not finding out about her sooner.
In this episode, she talks about Product-Led and Sales-Led models in a complementary way instead of the usual one-over-the-other kind of approach. Highly recommend.

🤓 Tools I’m using

I started using Ulysses this week to write these newsletters and I’m absolutely loving it. This is a spontaneous shootout, by the way, they’re not sponsoring this newsletter.

I love that I can write with markdown and that I can now write without being distracted by the internet. This also makes posting on WordPress dead easy. Check, check, check.

Ulysses is included in my Setapp subscription. You can get your first month for free on this link.